Rhaka Khan’s situation is far from over. Now, he has filed a lawsuit against a number of high-profile names, including some of the biggest in the entertainment industry.
Trenesha Biggers, also known as Rhaka Khan, filed a lawsuit against WWE and TNA on June 12th, but Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed it on June 12th. As part of an ongoing Texas criminal case, Biggers was accused of a conspiracy in the lawsuit filed in October 2022 in the Southern District of New York.
The defendants in this legal matter comprised of a wide range of entities, including: The State of Texas, El Paso Child Protective Services, the FBI, Las Cruces PD New Mexico, Among those involved are the NYPD, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the New York ACS, Omega Psi Phi Fraternity Inc., Shirley Police Department, Sigma Phi Epsilon, Suffolk County NY, and The Rock WWE people The Miz and Maryse , Impact Wrestling’s Heath Miller, WWE Hall of Famer Nikki Bella and her late husband Chris Benoit , former WWE star Mark Jindrak , Panda Energy (once owner of TNA/Impact), Home Depot , Florida Championship Wrestling (now defunct), Steve Keirn , National Wrestling Alliance ‘s President Billy Corgan , Deep South Wrestling (also defunct) Bank of America , basketball giant Michael Jordan and many other universities. Moreover Jim Cornette , Mick Foley and NYC energy company Con Edison are also listed.
Rhaka Khan has dismissed the case against The Rock and so many others.
Approximately 1,000 individuals and entities from various states are being sued by Plaintiff Trenesha Biggers (“Biggers”), who is appearing pro se. Her claims in New York State allege that, in 2019, individuals removed her children from her care during her arrest.
The Court granted Biggers’ request to proceed without paying fees. As the complaint doesn’t comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is dismissed. In the Southern District of New York, Biggers has 30 days to plead claims. Claims outside this District are also dismissed, as per 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), and such cases can be filed in the appropriate venues if wished.
The lawsuit alleged that these defendants conspired to kidnap Biggers and her children. Judge Swain dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that Biggers’ claims were unfounded.
We’ll have to wait and see how this court case unfolds. Until the judge rules, nothing is certain.
Do you remember when you were a fan of this court case? Tell us about your thoughts in the comments!
