The Undertaker Slams the Use of Light Tubes in Wrestling: ‘Ridiculous and Unnecessary’
In the sector of expert wrestling, The Undertaker’s name holds a sacred weight. With a WWE Hall of Fame career spanning decades, he is been through almost every high-impact moment conceivable. From iconic Hell in a Cell suits to legendary WrestleMania showdowns, he has faced and used a tremendous array of guns within the ring, making him no stranger to the chaos that frequently unfolds among the ropes.
Tables, ladders, chairs — these objects are deeply woven into the cloth of wrestling, to the point in which WWE even dedicated whole pay-according to-view occasions to them. However, the wrestling ring has visible more unconventional guns input the fray over the years. Fans have witnessed kendo sticks, bowling balls, leather-based straps, mannequin heads, and even thumbtacks punctuate brutal bouts. Yet, regardless of the infinite guns that have flown across the squared circle, there’s one that The Undertaker flat-out refuses to just accept.
Fluorescent Light Tubes Cross the Line for The Deadman
On his Six Feet Under podcast, The Undertaker spoke out in opposition to one precise weapon that he believes crosses the road: fluorescent mild tubes. A common sight in unbiased wrestling promotions, those light tubes are often smashed over competition’ heads and backs, leaving a cloud of dust and shattered glass in their wake. For The Undertaker, this isn’t just over-the-top — it’s downright absurd.
“I get stuff on my [social media] feed from people getting bashed with like, there will be eight fluorescent bulbs on a thing in front of 10 or 15 people,” The Undertaker shared. His disbelief was palpable as he continued, “They’re doing all this over-the-top stuff… I don’t know what the story is. All I’m seeing is, there’s not enough people in that audience to generate enough money to get me to take something that ridiculous.”
The Deadman’s frustration appears to stem from the perceived lack of experience in these intense moments. For him, taking such risks ought to come with a vast reward — something that’s sincerely missing in those small impartial suggests. He emphasised that if he have been nevertheless on the WWE payroll, where hundreds of thousands of viewers tune in and pay-per-view buys bring substantial revenue, he could justify certain risks. But in front of a handful of people for minimal return? That’s where The Undertaker draws the line.
AEW Pushes the Envelope Too
Recently, AEW (All Elite Wrestling) has garnered its very own proportion of controversy with its ambitious use of weapons all through fits. During their “All Out” pay-in step with-view event, Jon Moxley took matters to a harrowing severe with the aid of trying to suffocate Bryan Danielson with a plastic bag, a sight that left many viewers on facet. The violence escalated when Adam Page attempted to pierce Swerve Strickland’s cheek with a needle, following a brutal collection of cinder block slams among the 2.
The Undertaker’s remarks can be visible as a critique now not simply of independent shows but also of mainstream wrestling promotions like AEW, which hold to push the bounds of violence in pursuit of high ratings and buzzworthy moments. With the continuing evolution of wrestling and the ever-increasing demand for surprise value, the query lingers: how a ways is simply too far?
Is the Spectacle Worth the Risk?
The Undertaker’s disdain for those intense measures reflects the complex balancing act among entertainment and protection in expert wrestling. He’s a performer who has continually understood the need to captivate an audience, but he also is aware of that there are limits. While lovers crave action and surprising moments, there comes a point whilst the spectacle overshadows the ability, and the danger a long way outweighs the praise.
In an technology wherein impartial promotions and major gamers like AEW are always searching for to distinguish themselves, The Undertaker’s caution feels more applicable than ever. His voice consists of the burden of a person who has seen it all — a legend who is aware that a few traces should in no way be crossed, not even for the maximum interesting of moments.
